Licence Extension Rejected After Hot Birdies No-show

Southall chicken shop had asked to stay open until 2am

Hot Birdies is at 150 The Broadway
Hot Birdies is at 150 The Broadway. Picture: Ealing Council

Participate

Southall Shop Keeps Licence Despite Police Raid

Belly Dancing Venue's Licence Application Withdrawn

Councillors to Consider Belly Dancing Venue's Licence Application

Pitshanger Lane Cafe Gains Permission to Operate at Wine Bar

New South Ealing Majestic Wine Store Given Licence

Illegal Worker Employed at Northolt Store for Over a Year

Greenford Shop Paid Illegal Worker Below Minimum Wage

Shop Keeps Licence Despite Hiring Drug Dealing Student Overstayer

Southall To Get 'First Authentic Goan Store'

Southall To Get 'First Authentic Goan Store'

Fake Labubu Toys Seized in Counterfeit Goods Raid

Southall Pub Has Licence Suspended After Immigration Road

Southall Store Keeps Licence Despite Repeated Breachest

Ealing Bar Owner Who 'Knocked Out' Two Customers Loses Licence

Sign up for our weekly Ealing newsletter

Comment on this story on the

July 22, 2026

A Southall fast food restaurant has had its application to extend its hours beyond 11pm rejected.

Ealing Council’s licensing subcommittee rejected the plans in a hearing on Wednesday (July 22) after the applicant failed to turn up to the meeting. Hot Birdies, Southall, located at 150 The Broadway, had sought to remain open until 2am daily, seven days a week.

Hot Birdies, described as “the UK’s go-to destination for Nashville Hot Chicken”, currently operates between 11:30am and 11pm daily. The premises are based below a block of flats.

Following consultation with the Metropolitan Police, the applicant agreed to a comprehensive series of public safety and crime prevention conditions, including 31-day recording CCTV systems with immediate playback capabilities, mandatory trained staff on duty at all times, public warning signage, and an inspection-ready incident register. As such, Metropolitan Police Licensing Officers confirmed they had no objections to the application.

However, a local resident objected to the plans raising concerns about the prevention of public nuisance, crime and disorder. Ms Hanan Mussa said that allowing a fast food business to operate late at night would create “unmanageable noise disruption” when families are trying to sleep.

She added: “Late-night hot food venues frequently act as gathering points for individuals leaving nearby pubs. This accumulation of crowds late at night historically escalates anti-social behaviour, verbal disputes, and general street disorder, compromising the safety of our neighbourhood…

“The area surrounding The Broadway is already heavily saturated with commercial activity, and extending operations to a late night schedule pushes the balance away from community wellbeing. For the peace, safety, and health of Southall residents, I respectfully request that Ealing Council refuse this late night licence application.”

The committee was made up of three councillors. Councillor Kim Kaur Nagpal (Lab) chaired the meeting, alongside Cllr Charan Sharma (Lab), and Cllr Connie Hersch (Lib Dem).

Returning the decision, Cllr Nagpal said: “The subcommittee are not satisfied that the applicant, through its representative, demonstrated a sufficient knowledge or understanding of the particular sensitivities of this location… or the issues associated with late night activity in Southall.

“The subcommittee are also concerned that the applicant was not present at the hearing, and that there was no evidence of operational experience in providing late night refreshment beyond 11pm. The answers given did not reassure the subcommittee that the applicant had sufficient systems, policies, or practical measures in place to promote the licensing objectives.

“The subcommittee gave weight to the residents’ concerns about late night noise, delivery riders, customer dispersal, litter, and the impact on residents, particularly as there is residential accommodation above the premises. The subcommittee was not satisfied that these concerns had been adequately addressed…

“Whilst we acknowledge the applicant’s representative’s willingness to work with the council and agree to additional conditions, when considering whether additional conditions could address these concerns, we concluded that conditions would not be sufficient.”

Philip James Lynch - Local Democracy Reporter

Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More

This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.

Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.

We’ve always done that and won’t be changing, in fact we’d like to do more.

However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.

We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.

A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.

One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.

If you do support us in this way we’d be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you’d like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.