Belly Dancing Venue's Licence Application Withdrawn |
|
The Angels Club pulls bid for late night operation at last minute
June 11, 2026 The future of a proposed belly-dancing club in West Ealing has taken a new turn after the applicant withdrew her latest licensing bid shortly before councillors were due to consider it. The application for The Angels Club, submitted by Bianca Ailincai, had been scheduled for a hearing this Wednesday (10 June). It sought permission for alcohol sales, recorded music, dance performances and late-night refreshment until 4am at the basement of 25 Broadway. This was the third attempt to secure a licence for the venue, following refusals in May and August 2024. The meeting was cancelled after Ealing Council received an email from the representative for the club stating “my client does not wish to proceed with the hearing” with no specific reason given. The premises sits beneath Merkur Slots and is accessed via a narrow alleyway leading to Maitland Yard and Leeland Terrace. The Angels Club was described as a private members’ bar offering Bollywood and belly-dancing entertainment for up to 35–40 people. However, the application had attracted extensive objections from the Metropolitan Police, Regulatory Services, Environmental Health and the council’s Enforcement and Compliance team, as well as 13 residents. The strength of opposition mirrored concerns raised during previous bids. Police officers who visited the premises in April 2024 and again in April 2026 raised serious safeguarding concerns about the welfare of female dancers, the suitability of the venue’s layout and the lack of functioning CCTV. Officers reported that the basement has no natural light, limited visibility and blind spots where supervision would be difficult. They also noted that dancers would have no private changing area, instead waiting opposite a single toilet used by patrons, leaving them exposed to unwanted contact. In their written representation, police said they had “no confidence” in the applicant’s ability to protect performers, citing inconsistent explanations about how dancers would be recruited, paid and supervised. They also highlighted the secluded location and late operating hours as factors that could make the venue vulnerable to exploitation or criminal activity, warning that the proposals may not align with the borough’s stance on tackling male violence against women and girls. Council licensing officers echoed these concerns, pointing to the lack of clarity around membership controls, capacity management, smoking arrangements and safeguarding measures. They noted that the premises lies within Ealing’s Special Policy Area, where there is a presumption against granting new licences due to cumulative impact from crime, anti-social behaviour and late-night disturbance. Officers said the application failed to demonstrate how it would avoid adding to existing problems in an area already affected by street drinking, noise and disorder. Environmental Health officers also objected, citing previous observations of intoxicated customers, late-night gatherings and anti-social behaviour linked to the premises during earlier enforcement visits. In one incident recorded in April 2024, officers witnessed a woman appearing to perform a sexual act on a man in the alleyway behind the venue, followed by vomiting and requests for money. Other visits documented groups of drunk patrons arriving by car in the early hours, loitering outside the entrance and causing noise disturbance. Residents who submitted objections described the proposed 4am closing time as “excessive” and “wholly unsuitable” for a densely populated residential area. Several raised fears about increased noise, litter, street drinking and safety risks for families using the Broadway. Others questioned the repeated applications, suggesting that unresolved concerns from previous hearings had not been addressed. With the application now withdrawn, the scheduled licensing sub-committee meeting has been cancelled. It is not yet known whether a further revised application will be submitted, but any future bid is likely to face close scrutiny given the history of objections and the location’s position within the Special Policy Area.
|