Anger Over Proposed Mast at Brentham Meadows

Local conservationists dub application as 'totally unacceptable'


Brentham Meadow. Picture: Ben Morris

Participate

Controversial Lammas Park Plan Withdrawn

Council Offers Reassurance Amid Concerns Over East Lodge

Hanwell Campaigners Celebrate After 24-hour Slot Casino Blocked

New Apart-Hotel Approved for Former Woolworths Building

Residents Not Impressed with Mount Close Estate Plans

Huge Opposition to Lammas Park Flats Plan

Sign up for our weekly Ealing newsletter

Comment on this story on the

October 9, 2025

A planning application to install a 17.5-metre telecoms mast on Brentham Meadows in Ealing has drawn strong opposition from local environmental groups, who argue the development threatens one of London’s most ecologically sensitive green spaces. The proposal, submitted by Mobile Broadband Network Limited (MBNL)—a joint venture between EE and Three—is currently under consultation, with public comments invited until 14 October.

Brentham Meadows, a 9.5-acre site at the northern end of Brent River Park, is designated both as Metropolitan Open Land (MOL) and a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINC)—protections equivalent to Green Belt status. The proposed mast, which is by the allotments, would replace a previous installation on the roof of the Westworld building near the A40, which has since been decommissioned.

According to planning documents submitted by MBNL, the mast is required to restore mobile coverage for EE and Three customers following the loss of the Westworld site. The company claims to have assessed alternative locations, including rooftops and brownfield sites, but found none suitable due to technical limitations, lack of landlord consent, or inadequate elevation.

The application argues that Brentham Meadows is the only viable location that meets operational requirements, and that the mast’s slimline design and limited footprint will minimise visual and environmental impact. While acknowledging the need to remove a mature oak tree and other vegetation, the applicant states this is necessary for installation and access.

MBNL is seeking prior approval for siting and appearance under permitted development rights, citing national planning policy that supports digital infrastructure rollout. The company contends that the public benefit of improved mobile connectivity outweighs the localised impact.

Local organisations including the Brent River Park charity, Ealing Wildlife Group, Ealing Parks Foundation, and Brentham Allotment Gardens Society have united in opposition, warning that the mast could cause irreversible harm to a rare meadow habitat and set a precedent for development on protected land.

Campaigners have raised several concerns about the proposed development. They note that meadow habitats have declined by 98% since the Second World War, and Brentham Meadows currently supports important bat foraging routes and bird nesting areas, making biodiversity loss a significant risk. The proposal would also require the removal of a mature oak tree that is believed to have centuries of life remaining. Additionally, the site lies on a functional floodplain within Brent River Park, raising concerns about increased flood risk. It is also argued that the development may conflict with the Environment Act 2021 and local biodiversity policies. Finally, they emphasise the community impact, pointing out that Brentham Meadows is regularly used for recreation and wellbeing and forms part of a vital green corridor in the area.

Katie Boyles of the Brent River Park charity said, “Attempting to install a telecoms mast on both Metropolitan Open Land and a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation is wholly unacceptable. We strongly urge the applicant and council to seek alternative sites that do not threaten biodiversity and well-being on our doorstep.”

Sean McCormack, Chair of Ealing Wildlife Group, added, “Constructing the mast would require the removal of a mature oak tree that has centuries left to live. It sets a dangerous precedent and is totally unacceptable.”

Robin John of Brentham Allotment Gardens Society questioned the claim that no alternatives exist, noting that the mast is intended to replace one previously located on a nearby brownfield site. He says, “If it was on a building before, put it on another building.”

The planning application can be viewed here, and residents can submit comments via the Ealing Council planning portal. The Brent River Park charity has published a template objection letter for those wishing to respond.

Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More

This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.

Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.

We’ve always done that and won’t be changing, in fact we’d like to do more.

However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.

We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.

A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.

One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.

If you do support us in this way we’d be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you’d like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.