Residents Not Impressed with Mount Close Estate Plans

Proposal is for 178 flats in blocks up to six storeys high

visualisation of the proposed new development
A visualisation of the proposed new development. Picture: Bell Phillips Architects

Participate

Big Turnout for Hanwell Protest Against Slot Casino

Clocktower Slot Casino Faces Huge Opposition

Over 100 Objections Fail to Stop Perivale HMO

North Hanwell Residents Fear HMO Displacement

Perivale Community Protests Against HMO Proliferation

Huge Opposition to Lammas Park Flats Plan

Sign up for our weekly Ealing newsletter

Comment on this story on the

August 5, 2025

Plans to redevelop the Mount Close Estate in Ealing have sparked opposition from residents, despite the developer’s assurances of affordability, sustainability, and architectural sensitivity.

The proposal (252540FUL) for the additional housing on the 0.95-hectare site on Mount Avenue near the junction with Castlebar Road, has been submitted by affordable housing charity Dolphin Living and designed by Bell Phillips Architects. It envisages a major overhaul of the 1950s estate, including the demolition of two blocks, refurbishment of four existing buildings, and construction of six new ones.

The estate currently has 40 flats arranged around open spaces and was acquired by Dolphin Living in 2016 from the Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC).

The scheme promises to deliver a total of 178 flats, with a target of 50% affordable housing by habitable room, and aims to retain over 70% of existing homes to reduce embodied carbon.

According to the developer, the scheme will offer all original pre-2016 residents a new flat tailored to their needs, improve landscaping with climate-resilient and inclusive green spaces, and introduce high-quality architecture inspired by local Victorian villas and interwar mansion blocks. The estate’s current ‘car-dominated’ layout will be reimagined to prioritise pedestrian and cycle access, with new communal amenities and enhanced refuse and parking strategies.

A visualisation of the proposed new development. Picture: Bell Phillips Architects
A visualisation of the proposed new development. Picture: Bell Phillips Architects

However, residents have voiced strong objections on the council’s planning portal, citing overdevelopment, ecological harm, and inadequate consultation. At the time of writing there were 32 comments, all objecting to the proposal. Many argue that the proposed 5–6 storey buildings are out of scale with the surrounding 2–4 storey homes, breaching both local and London-wide planning policies that require developments to respect neighbourhood character. The cumulative impact of this scheme alongside the nearby Nile Lodge development is also a concern, with fears of prolonged disruption and loss of suburban identity.

Critics have also challenged the scheme’s affordable housing claims, noting that much of it relies on Discount Market Rent, which they argue is not genuinely affordable. The lack of family-sized units and substandard daylight provision further fuel misgivings. Transport issues are another flashpoint, with the site’s poor Public Transport Accessibility Level (PTAL) and uncertain parking controls seen as likely to exacerbate congestion and stress on local infrastructure.


The proposal describes the existing estate as 'car-dominated'

The removal of mature trees and reduction of green space has drawn particular ire, with residents accusing the developers of undermining biodiversity and breaching urban greening policies. Many also criticised the community engagement process as rushed and insufficient, calling for greater transparency and genuine dialogue.

The developer has a web site with more details of its plans.

Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More

This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.

Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.

We’ve always done that and won’t be changing, in fact we’d like to do more.

However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.

We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.

A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.

One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.

If you do support us in this way we’d be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you’d like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.