Forum Topics

CPZ abuse

Can it be a coincidence that the proposed CPZ changes reported on this website were slipped in a now barely circulated local newspaper, are proposals that best suit the employer of the same councillor responsible for parking ?I wonder if he is to be one of the recipients of said permits?This councillor and his chums and their somewhat distorting & underhand methods are nothing short of despicable.Every paying CPZ permit holder should have been clearly informed about the intentions of changes to the system. This should have been done in 'About Ealing' and/or emailing every CPZ holder which would contact the vast majority.If I get emails from LBE consulting me on all manner of proposals many of which are not relevant to me, why not one on something that is?It's a fiddle. It's seems also to be a rather characteristic technique of this councillor's employer, A2Dominion.  Are they pulling his strings?Just 25 permits near a station or shopping area will be enough to return some streets to the problems that led residents to sign up to a CPZ in the first place.It wholly undermines those who are paying already too much for all day zones which exist because of the risk of all day and part day parking.The original remit for CPZs in Ealing was as a service first and foremost to local residents.It was also not for profit and would never rise higher than the rate of inflation.This was reiterated again and again.  I know. I was one who attended many 'resident partnership' meetings with the then Labour administration when the CPZs were in their infancy. Zone C in particular.  " Any operating surplus will be ploughed back into the zones for improvements to roads and services"In any case, why are local registered GPs having to pay for permits? Why do they not have free permits for Zones that fall into their practice domains?In actual terms it costs nothing. A very poor justification and rather crass to use medics as an excuse to justify others most certainly not deserving.Why are full time unpaid carers paying for permits?Why are elderly over 80 not getting an allowance of free visitor permits?Businesses have had to pay top dollar if they happen to be based inside a CPZ.This hit sole traders and small businesses like small shops very hard and forced some out completely.This latest proposal is purely to suit this councillors employers at A2Dominion who no doubt will be paying for the permits from the large amount of taxpayers money they receive with no accountability.It is bad enough that a Council Leader has failed to explain a highly unorthodox arrangement with A2D over a property but to find another high ranking portfolio councillor also employed by the said company and behind a rather hypocritical change that undermines the whole ethos the CPZ scheme nothing short of shameless.It would not surprise me if they also get free permits.As others have mentioned, there really should be a rather full investigation, why is this not being pressed hard for?

Mark Kehoe ● 4255d25 Comments ● 4239d