Council Accused of Dragging Out Victoria Hall Tribunal Process

Borough has applied to be represented at hearing

Campaigners outside Victoria Hall
Campaigners outside Victoria Hall. Picture: Roger Green

Participate

Council Accused of Holding 'Secret' Meeting on Victoria Hall

Victoria Hall Legal Challenge Scheduled

Victoria Hall Campaign Taking Charity Commission To Court

Victoria Hall Sale ‘Means No Government Cash for the Arts in Ealing’

Fears For Future of Victoria Hall

Bid To Save Historice Victoria Hall Steps Up

Council Face Huge Bill if Hotel Deal Falls Through

Gloves Off In Town Hall Battle

Council accused of Selling 'Crown Jewels'

Sign up for our weekly Ealing newsletter

Comment on this story on the

Ealing Council has been accepted as a party to the Charity Tribunal court case that will decide the fate of the Victoria Hall leading to accusations that it is ‘muscling in’ on the process.

The Friends of Victoria Hall (FoVH) have condemned the council for making the application to be a second respondent in the case arguing that it presents an unresolvable conflict of interest.

In April 2021, the Friends of the Victoria Hall (FoVH) appealed to the Charity Tribunal to prevent the Charity Commission from allowing the Council to change the rules of the Victoria Hall Trust so that it can take over its property which was gifted for the benefit of the local community in 1893.

The FoVH believes that Ealing Council did not originally plan to be represented at the tribunal but opted to do so at a late stage when it learnt that the Commission was not intending to put up any witnesses at the hearing. It believes that the decision to do this was taken a ‘secret’ meeting of the charitable Trust’s committee in September from which the public was excluded.

In July 2016 Ealing Council entered into an agreement with a developer to sell off the Town Hall on a 250-year lease to turn it into a luxury hotel. The deal included the Victoria Hall which accounts for over 20% of the property and which belongs to the Victoria Hall Trust, not the Council.

Roger Green, the Chair of FoVH said, ‘The Council’s very late request to oppose the appeal looks likely to drag out further a farrago of a process that’s already been going on for five years.

‘Not only will this be at considerable expense in legal fees to council taxpayers but it will inevitably delay even longer the time when the people of Ealing will once more be able to use the facilities that the Victoria Hall benefactors bestowed on them.‘

FoVH initiated its court action in April and its says it was only on 1 October that the Director of Legal Services at the Council wrote to ask whether the appellants had any objection to their application to join the Tribunal.

Mr Green said, ‘We had an idea that something was going on as the Charity Commission had failed to submit their case to the Tribunal by the due date, and then there was that ‘secret’ meeting of the Victoria Hall Charitable Trust in mid-September. Now we know what they were up to and there’s a clear conflict of interest.’

As well as their role within Ealing Council, the Director of Legal Services also advises the Council’s Victoria Hall ‘Trust’ on legal matters which FoVH believes will create confusion at the tribunal.

A council spokesperson said,“The council, acting in its capacity as the sole Trustee of the Victoria Hall, has been grateful to have been granted permission to join into the proceedings and is currently preparing evidence for submission to the Tribunal. The Victoria Hall Trust Committee (which includes 5 elected Councillors and 3 independent Trustees) has considered all options available to the Trust and have determined that the Trust should support the Council’s proposal to redevelop the Town Hall in partnership with Mastcraft, on the basis that this is the best option to secure a sustainable and long-term future for the Victoria Hall Trust and the local people it serves. Earlier this year, the Charity Commission took the decision to support the Trust’s position.”

Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More

This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.

Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.

We’ve always done that and won’t be changing, in fact we’d like to do more.

However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.

We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.

A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.

One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.

If you do support us in this way we’d be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you’d like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.


November 5, 2021

Bookmark and Share