JULIAN BELL HONESTY TEST UPDATE
Julian Bell Honesty Test. Update. I asked Bell a simple question over a month ago. It concerned the circumstances in which Mr Najsarek gained employment with Ealing Council? It was: “Did you already know anything of what appeared in the press on June 30 2016 in respect of Mr Najsarek’s behaviour in Bolton when you appointed him?” Bell must have known the answer. All he needed to say was yes or no. A dilemma. If he said “yes”, he would reveal that he had been dishonest with the people of Ealing when he praised Najserak’s wonderful record of public service. If you said “no”, he would confirm that Mr Najserak had successfully deceived his way into Ealing Council.A test of integrity for a public servant! Not Bell. He ignored the email. He was guilty of a LIE BY OMISSION. As an avowed Christian, Bell, I am sure, would have been familiar with the Epistle of St James, the origin of this concept. It was his obligation as a public servant to make himself accountable. He failed. It is was his obligation as a public servant to be honest. It is my opinion and allegation (which I believe is supported by the simple evidence of this case) that he is a public liar and, as such, unfit for public office. I have told him to understand that every working day from now on I am asking the same question. HOW OFTEN WILL JULIAN BELL LIE TO ANDREW FARMER? FIVE DAYS SO FAR – AND COUNTING.
Andrew Farmer ● 2282d105 Comments ● 1916d