Public Urination Concerns Lead to Licence Refusal


Police concerned Singh's Superstore would attract street drinkers

Singh's Superstore) on Beaconsfield Road
Singh’s Superstore) on Beaconsfield Road. Picture: Google Streetview

October 22, 2026

A Southall shop has had its application to sell alcohol rejected due to concerns about street drinking in the area.

The Corner Shop (Singh’s Superstore) on 6 Beaconsfield Road, whose sign already states it sells beers and spirits, sought permission to sell alcohol between 8am and 11pm Monday to Saturday and between 10am and 10.30pm on Sundays. However, during the licensing hearing on Wednesday (October 21), the applicant, Mr Sukhpal Singh Chopra, offered to reduce the hours alcohol would be sold.

This proved to be a point of contention between the store and Ealing Council officers who raised concerns about the sale of alcohol at early morning hours when children are going to the nearby school.

The committee chair and councillor for Perivale, Munir Ahmed, asked Mr Singh Chopra: “When you put the application, you applied for hours starting [at] 8 o’clock to sell alcohol. So the question we are asking is that if you are a responsible person, if you have that in mind that this is a special policy area, then why did you not think that 8 o’clock is too early, and there are schools, there are offices, this was not a good thing… why did that not come to your mind?”

In response, Mr Singh Chopra reaffirmed his offer to change these hours. During the meeting, he told councillors that business costs are increasing so substantially he cannot afford to hire any staff beyond his brother to run the shop.

He argued that the sale of alcohol would support his business and improve its prospects. However, councillors reaffirmed that this is not something which can be taken into consideration when determining a licensing application.

The premises is located within the Southall Special Policy Area (SPA), where there is a policy presumption against applications which are likely to add to the cumulative impact of issues such as street drinking – unless the applicant can demonstrate that the premises would not exacerbate such problems. However, Mr Singh Chopra failed to convince councillors this would be the case.

Evidence given by the Metropolitan Police held significant weight in the outcome of the committee. In a written statement, PC Anu Mittu said: “The reason why an SPA was introduced was because it was recognised the serious public nuisance, crime and disorder and anti-social behaviour that was generated and fuelled by the presence of alcohol being readily available from licenced premises…

“Southall is known to be a problematic area for street drinking and there has been an increase in crime and anti-social behaviour, with individuals loitering on the streets and drinking alcohol. This in turn leads to urinating in the street, littering and making members of the public feel unsafe when walking by them – particularly women and children as well as vulnerable adults.

“There are also assaults that occur between these drunk individuals which give a general feeling of the area being unsafe as this location appears to be a magnet for anti-social behaviour and crime and disorder, but also people with substance abuse issues.

“The individuals, who are often in groups, usually arrive with alcohol, which is shop bought cider, beer, lager and spirits and they drink throughout the day. This usually ends up with drunk, intoxicated individuals passing out on benches where available, side streets, car parks, parks and alleyways.”

Returning the decision, Cllr Munir Ahmed said: “Although the applicant acknowledged the reasons for this special policy area, his answers did not sufficiently explain how the proposed operation would address those particular concerns or demonstrate adequate practical arrangements to avoid adding negatively to existing cumulative impact.”

He added that the committee considered whether conditions offered by Mr Singh Chopra would enable the granting of a licence, however the councillors determined that it would not, and if approved would add to the cumulative impact of a concentration of off-licences in the area.

Philip James Lynch - Local Democracy Reporter

Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More

This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.

Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.

We’ve always done that and won’t be changing, in fact we’d like to do more.

However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.

We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.

A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.

One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.

If you do support us in this way we’d be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you’d like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.