Warren Farm Petition Hits 20,000 Signatures

Wildlife experts urging council to carry out habitat survey


Dr Mark Spencer protesting outside Ealing Town Hall. Picture: Richard Carter Photography

Participate

Huge Warren Farm Protest Fails to Sway Council Committee

Warren Farm Campaigners Plan Demonstration

Angry Reaction as Warren Farm Proposals Approved

Fate of Warren Farm Set to Be Decided

Local Plan 'Could Mean the End' for Borough's Skylarks

Warren Farm Campaigners Say Consultation Backs Total Re-wilding

Southall FC Hoping To Make Warren Farm Its Home

Call for All of Warren Farm To Be Made Nature Reserve

Could Skylarks Save Warren Farm ?

Sign up for our weekly Ealing newsletter

Comment on this story on the

March 15, 2023

Support for keeping the whole of Warren Farm as a nature reserve is continuing to grow with the petition in favour now surpassing 20,000 signatures.

With Ealing Council having decided to press ahead with the reintroduction of sports to the site, wildlife experts are reiterating that it should carry out a habitat survey before proceeding.

This was also the recommendation made by the council’s Overview and Scrutiny Committee (OSC) at its meeting on 21 February , after hearing evidence from ecological and wildlife experts Dr Mark A Spencer, of the London Natural History Society, and Dr Sean McCormack, founder of the Ealing Wildlife Group. They explained that the council’s proposals risked falling foul of both national and London-wide policies. It is being claimed that the proposed development on Warren Farm would not achieve the “mandatory Biodiversity Net Gain” of 10 percent being imposed by the government from November 2023. It would also fall short of the GLA’s objectives as laid out in the London Plan and the London Environment Strategy, which also call for Biodiversity Net Gain and require new developments to include new wildlife habitats.

The Warren Farm Nature Reserve campaign has written to council leader Peter Mason asking him to carry out a Phase 1 Habitat Survey, using the London Open Spaces Survey methodology, as recommended by Dr Spencer.

Campaigners say it is crucial that this is done before Ealing Council appoints a Development Partner. The council stated in its cabinet report The Future of Warren Farm Sports Ground that it would advertise for bids from potential Development Partners this month.

It is being argued that it would be unwise to identify a development partner for Warren Farm before Ealing Council is fully aware of the habitat and biodiversity implications of developing the site.

Dr Spencer commented, “Ealing Council has a lot of work to do before it can even consider putting together a development proposal. It is essential for the council to have a record of what is present on Warren Farm Nature Reserve now, as baseline data, before it goes any further. It will need this information before it approaches Natural England. To show the mandatory Biodiversity Net Gain all developments will need after November 2023, will require more extensive surveys.

“So far, the council has been unable to show that it has this information. Determining the current state of Warren Farm’s established neutral and acid grassland habitat and the abundance of common, rare and vulnerable species it contains, is essential prior to the commencement of any development proposals. It seems somewhat premature to advertise for a Development Partner before carrying out this survey.”

The council has described the Warren Farm proposal as a win-win for the borough with the reintroduction of sports activities being combined with what it describes as ‘London’s biggest rewilding project’. Although some land that was given over to nature, and became a habitat for skylarks, will be built on, the council is aiming to allow adjacent plots of land to be rewilded as an offset.

Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More

This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.

Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.

We’ve always done that and won’t be changing, in fact we’d like to do more.

However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.

We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.

A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.

One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.

If you do support us in this way we’d be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least two articles a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you’d like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.

 

Bookmark and Share